| Share this post! | Vote this! |
|
JavaScript code that runs on one browser does not necessarily
mean it will work on others. Without unit testing this code, organizations pay
money for testing and re-testing web applications when deciding to upgrade or
support new browsers. In this article, learn how efficient unit testing of
your JavaScript can reduce testing costs and make it easier for you to support
more browsers.
A broken JavaScript code example
One of the biggest challenges facing web applications is the support of web browsers with different versions. JavaScript code running on Safari does not necessarily work on Windows® Internet Explorer (IE), Firefox, or Google Chrome. This challenge is inherited from the lack of testing the JavaScript code living in the presentation tier from day one. Without unit testing this code, organizations may pay for repeated testing of web applications after upgrading or supporting new browsers. This article shows you how to reduce testing costs using efficient unit testing for JavaScript code. more...
A broken JavaScript code example
One of the biggest challenges facing web applications is the support of web browsers with different versions. JavaScript code running on Safari does not necessarily work on Windows® Internet Explorer (IE), Firefox, or Google Chrome. This challenge is inherited from the lack of testing the JavaScript code living in the presentation tier from day one. Without unit testing this code, organizations may pay for repeated testing of web applications after upgrading or supporting new browsers. This article shows you how to reduce testing costs using efficient unit testing for JavaScript code. more...
0 comments:
Post a Comment